“Tired with this subject…” – Newton and Publication

Isaac Newton’s publication record is not exactly impressive: two articles, the New Theory of Light and Colours (1672) and the Hypothesis of Light (1675), and two books, the Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687) and Opticks (1703). Even if we include the second and third editions of the Principia, which contained major revisions, the various editions of Opticks, and all his (semi-) public correspondence, a fictional Collected Works of Isaac Newton would scarcely amount to more than ten volumes. In comparison, Robert Boyle’s collected (published) works would come in at about 17 volumes, and Christiaan Huygens’s at 22. And they did not live until the ripe old age of 84, as Newton did.

So why did Newton publish so little?

In December I presented a paper at Imperial College about Newton’s publication strategies as part of the Silences of Science series, which was recorded and can be found here:

https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/humanities/Public/files/Silences%20of%20science/Kees-Jan%20Schilt%20-%20Tired%20with%20this%20subject.mp3

In this paper (forthcoming) I argue for a connection between Newton’s publication strategies, his view of what it meant to be a natural philosopher, and his alchemical endeavours. Enjoy!

15/01 added: Felicity Mellor’s excellent take on Silences of Science: http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2014/jan/15/shhhh-scientists-need-to-talk-about-not-talking

Advertisements

2 Comments Add yours

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s